https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2007-10268-2
Regular Article
Intrusion of fluids into nanogrooves
How geometry determines the shape of the gas-liquid interface
1
Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany
2
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, SW7 2BZ, London, UK
3
Departamento de Fısica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Apdo. Postal 55-534, 09340, México D.F., Mexico
* e-mail: holger.bohlen@fluids.tu-berlin.de
** e-mail: a.o.parry@ic.ac.uk
*** e-mail: diaz@xanum.uam.mx
**** e-mail: martin.schoen@fluids.tu-berlin.de
Received:
18
October
2007
Accepted:
11
January
2008
Published online:
27
February
2008
We study the shape of gas-liquid interfaces forming inside rectangular nanogrooves (i.e., slit-pores capped on one end). On account of purely repulsive fluid-substrate interactions the confining walls are dry (i.e., wet by vapor) and a liquid-vapor interface intrudes into the nanogrooves to a distance determined by the pressure (i.e., chemical potential). By means of Monte Carlo simulations in the grand-canonical ensemble (GCEMC) we obtain the density ρ(z) along the midline (x = 0 of the nanogroove for various geometries (i.e., depths D and widths L of the nanogroove. We analyze the density profiles with the aid of an analytic expression which we obtain through a transfer-matrix treatment of a one-dimensional effective interface Hamiltonian. Besides geometrical parameters such as D and L , the resulting analytic expression depends on temperature T , densities of coexisting gas and liquid phases in the bulk ρg,l x and the interfacial tension γ . The latter three quantities are determined in independent molecular dynamics simulations of planar gas-liquid interfaces. Our results indicate that the analytic formula provides an excellent representation of ρ(z) as long as L is sufficiently small. At larger L the meniscus of the intruding liquid flattens. Under these conditions the transfer-matrix analysis is no longer adequate and the agreement between GCEMC data and the analytic treatment is less satisfactory.
PACS: 68.03.-g Gas-liquid and vacuum-liquid interfaces – / 68.03.Fg Evaporation and condensation of liquids – / 65.20.De General theory of thermodynamic properties of liquids, including computer simulation –
© EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag, 2008